Integrative Plant Systems Biology: Linking Physiology, Metabolism, Ecology, and Biotechnology for Climate-Resilient Crop Improvement

1. Introduction

Plants serve as the primary interface between the biosphere and atmosphere, sustaining terrestrial life through photosynthesis, carbon capture, nutrient cycling, and ecosystem stability, while crop plants are central to global food security as sources of nutrients, industrial raw materials, and renewable energy (1,2). Beyond agriculture, plants regulate climate, support soil formation, maintain hydrological cycles, and preserve biodiversity, making them essential for ecological and economic stability; however, their productivity is increasingly threatened by climate change (3). Rising temperatures, altered precipitation, elevated CO₂, and frequent extreme events impose multiple simultaneous stresses such as drought, heat, salinity, and oxidative stress, which disrupt photosynthesis, metabolism, and plant development, while also intensifying pest and pathogen pressures, leading to yield instability (4). Importantly, plant responses to these stresses are governed by highly integrated molecular, physiological, and ecological networks rather than isolated pathways (5). Traditional crop improvement approaches, including phenotypic selection and gene-centric methods, have achieved significant gains but are limited in addressing complex, multifactorial stress conditions (6). Traits like stress tolerance and metabolic plasticity arise from interconnected regulatory systems spanning multiple biological scales, necessitating a shift from reductionist to systems-level approaches (7,8). Plant systems biology provides this framework by integrating multi-omics technologies with computational modeling and network analysis to understand plants as interconnected systems (9). This approach enables identification of key regulatory hubs, feedback mechanisms, and metabolic constraints governing growth, stress responses, and adaptation, while linking genotype to phenotype across dynamic environments (10). Since plant function operates across hierarchical levels from genes and metabolism to physiology, communities, and ecosystemsenvironmental signals trigger cascading responses that influence resource allocation, development, and productivity (11,12). Advances in phenotyping, big-data analytics, and artificial intelligence now make such multi-scale integration feasible, offering new opportunities to enhance crop resilience and sustainability under changing climatic conditions.

Biotechnological innovations further amplify the translational potential of systems biology. Precision genome editing tools, including CRISPR-based technologies, enable targeted modification of genes and regulatory elements identified through network analyses (13). Metabolic engineering and synthetic biology approaches allow the redesign of biochemical pathways to enhance stress tolerance, nutrient content, and yield stability. When combined with ecological insights and predictive modeling, these tools facilitate rational crop design rather than empirical trait selection (14). Such integration is central to developing climate-resilient crops capable of maintaining productivity under environmental uncertainty. Despite remarkable progress in individual domains of physiology, metabolism, ecology, and biotechnology, these disciplines often remain fragmented. A comprehensive framework that explicitly links these dimensions is essential for advancing climate-smart agriculture. Integrative plant systems biology seeks to unify mechanistic understanding with ecological context and technological application, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration and data-driven innovation (15).

This review synthesizes current advances in integrative plant systems biology and examines how linking physiological regulation, metabolic networks, ecological dynamics, and biotechnological interventions can accelerate climate-resilient crop improvement. We first outline the conceptual foundations and methodological platforms underpinning systems-based plant research. We then explore the regulation of plant physiology and metabolism under environmental stress, highlighting network-level adaptations. Subsequently, we discuss ecological and evolutionary drivers of plant resilience, computational modeling strategies, and emerging biotechnological tools for crop engineering. Finally, we consider translational pathways, policy implications, and future research priorities necessary for sustainable agricultural systems. In the context of accelerating climate change and a rapidly growing global population, advancing integrative plant systems biology is not merely a scientific endeavor but a strategic necessity. By embracing systems-level thinking and cross-disciplinary integration, plant science can transition from reactive stress mitigation to predictive and design-oriented crop development, ensuring agricultural stability and ecological sustainability in an uncertain future.

2. Foundations of Plant Systems Biology

Plant systems biology represents a paradigm shift in plant research, transitioning from reductionist approaches toward integrative frameworks that capture the dynamic complexity of biological systems. Unlike traditional methodologies that examine individual genes or pathways in isolation, systems biology seeks to understand how molecular components interact within regulatory, metabolic, and ecological networks to produce emergent plant traits (16). This holistic perspective is particularly essential in the context of climate change, where plant responses arise from coordinated multi-level interactions rather than single-gene effects (17). Plant function is inherently multiscale, spanning hierarchical levels of biological organization from genes and proteins to cells, tissues, organs, whole organisms, communities, and ecosystems. Environmental signals perceived at the molecular level propagate through signaling cascades and transcriptional networks, reshaping metabolic fluxes and physiological outputs that ultimately determine growth, reproduction, and survival. Systems biology integrates these scales to decipher how genotype translates into phenotype under dynamic environmental conditions (18).

2.1 Concept of Systems Biology in Plant Science

Plant systems biology is built on three core principles: integration, interaction, and prediction, which together enable a comprehensive understanding of plant function. Integration involves combining diverse datasets such as genomic sequences, gene expression profiles, protein interactions, metabolite levels, and phenotypic traits into unified frameworks, allowing a shift from descriptive to mechanistic analysis (19). Interaction emphasizes that plant traits arise from complex, interconnected networks involving gene regulation, metabolism, hormonal signaling, and environmental feedback, where processes such as carbon metabolism, nitrogen assimilation, and stress responses are tightly coordinated rather than operating in isolation (20). Prediction, a key feature of systems biology, uses computational modeling and network reconstruction to simulate plant responses, identify regulatory hubs, and forecast phenotypic outcomes, supporting rational crop design and climate adaptation strategies (21).

This approach extends across multiple biological scales, from molecular to ecosystem levels, linking gene regulatory networks and protein interactions with metabolic fluxes, physiological processes like photosynthesis and nutrient uptake, and ultimately plant performance and ecosystem dynamics (22). Climate change impacts operate across these scales simultaneously; for example, drought influences cellular signaling, physiological responses, whole-plant carbon allocation, and ecological interactions, highlighting the need for integrated, multiscale analysis (23). Central to this framework is the network-based view of plant function, where genes, proteins, metabolites, and traits are interconnected as nodes within regulatory and metabolic systems. Network analysis enables identification of key hubs, bottlenecks, and functional modules that control stress tolerance and productivity, revealing emergent properties such as robustness and adaptability that cannot be understood through single-gene approaches (24,25).

2.2 Omics Platforms Driving Plant Systems Research

High-throughput omics technologies have become central to plant systems biology by generating comprehensive datasets across multiple layers of biological regulation. Genomics provides the foundational blueprint by decoding genome sequences and identifying genetic variation linked to adaptive traits, supporting genome-wide association studies and network reconstruction (26). Transcriptomics captures global gene expression patterns under developmental and stress conditions, enabling identification of regulatory networks and stress-responsive genes (27). Proteomics adds a functional layer by analyzing protein abundance, modifications, and interactions, offering insights into signaling pathways beyond transcript levels (28). Metabolomics links molecular activity to phenotype by profiling small molecules involved in primary and secondary metabolism, revealing metabolic reprogramming under stress (29). Phenomics integrates imaging and sensor-based technologies to quantify plant traits such as growth, biomass, and stress responses at the field scale, bridging molecular data with real-world performance (30). While each omics layer provides valuable information, their integration is essential for a systems-level understanding of plant biology. However, challenges such as data heterogeneity, differences in scale, computational demands, and lack of standardization limit effective integration (31). Advances in machine learning, network modeling, and cloud-based platforms are overcoming these barriers by enabling multidimensional data analysis, predictive modeling, and accelerated gene discovery (32). Integrative databases and digital platforms further support data sharing and reproducibility, allowing reconstruction of complex regulatory networks. The convergence of multi-omics and computational tools is transforming plant science from fragmented analysis to predictive, systems-level frameworks, providing a strong foundation for improving crop resilience and productivity (33).

3. Regulation of Plant Physiology and Metabolism

Plant survival, productivity, and resilience depend on tightly coordinated physiological and metabolic processes that regulate energy capture, allocation, and utilization through interconnected networks rather than isolated reactions. Photosynthesis, respiration, and metabolic fluxes are dynamically controlled by environmental signals, developmental cues, and stress conditions, making systems-level understanding essential for improving crop performance under climate variability (34). Photosynthesis drives plant productivity by converting solar energy into chemical energy, with its efficiency influenced by factors such as temperature, light, water availability, and atmospheric CO₂ (35). At the molecular level, coordinated regulation of photosystems, electron transport chains, and the Calvin–Benson cycle, along with factors like Rubisco activity, chlorophyll stability, and membrane organization, determines carbon fixation efficiency (36). Under stress, especially heat and drought, photosynthesis is impaired, leading to reduced carbon assimilation and increased reactive oxygen species, which plants counter through antioxidant systems, non-photochemical quenching, and stomatal adjustments (37). Respiration complements photosynthesis by generating ATP and reducing power, with mitochondrial pathways closely linked to carbon metabolism and redox balance (38). During stress, respiratory pathways are reprogrammed, and mechanisms such as the alternative oxidase pathway help maintain electron flow and reduce oxidative damage (39). Energy regulation is further controlled by central sensors like TOR and SnRK1, where TOR promotes growth under favorable conditions,s and SnRK1 activates stress-responsive, catabolic pathways during energy limitation, integrating nutrient, carbon, and stress signals to balance growth and defense (40–42). Climate change further impacts this energy balance by increasing photorespiration at higher temperatures and altering carbon assimilation under elevated CO₂, highlighting the importance of systems-level modeling to optimize carbon-use efficiency and maintain yield stability under changing environmental conditions (43).

3.1 Primary and Secondary Metabolism Networks

Plant metabolism consists of interconnected primary and secondary pathways that collectively support growth, development, and environmental adaptation. Primary metabolism, including carbohydrate metabolism (glycolysis and TCA cycle), nitrogen assimilation, lipid biosynthesis, and amino acid synthesis, provides energy, reducing power, and essential cellular components, with tight coordination between carbon and nitrogen metabolism determining biomass accumulation and nutrient-use efficiency (44). Under stress conditions, these pathways are dynamically reprogrammed; for example, drought promotesthe accumulation of osmoprotectants such as proline and soluble sugars, while heat stress alters membrane lipid composition to maintain stability, reflecting metabolic plasticity. Systems-level analyses, including flux balance and isotope-labeling studies, show that these pathways function as integrated networks where disturbances in one pathway affect overall energy balance and redox homeostasis, enabling identification of key metabolic bottlenecks (45). Secondary metabolism, involving compounds such as phenolics, flavonoids, alkaloids, terpenoids, and glucosinolates, plays essential roles in defense, signaling, and stress tolerance, often induced by environmental stress through hormonal pathways like jasmonic acid, salicylic acid, and abscisic acid (46,47). These pathways are closely linked to primary metabolism through shared precursors, such as the phenylpropanoid pathway derived from phenylalanine, and reflect a dynamic trade-off between growth and defense (48,49). At the network level, plant metabolism exhibits modular organization, feedback regulation, and redundancy, ensuring robustness under fluctuating conditions. Integration of multi-omics data has enabled the development of genome-scale metabolic models that predict flux redistribution and guide metabolic engineering, emphasizing that enhancing stress tolerance without yield loss requires coordinated reprogramming of metabolic networks rather than modification of individual genes (50).

3.2  Hormonal Signaling and Growth Regulation

Plant hormones act as central integrators of environmental signals and developmental programs, coordinating growth, metabolism, and defense through interconnected signaling networks rather than independent pathways (51). Key hormones, including auxins, cytokinins, gibberellins (GAs), abscisic acid (ABA), ethylene, jasmonates (JA), salicylic acid (SA), and brassinosteroids, regulate processes such as cell division, elongation, organ formation, and stress adaptation via tightly controlled transcriptional and signaling mechanisms (52,53). Hormonal cross-talk is essential for balancing plant responses; for example, ABA suppresses GA-driven growth during drought, JA and SA interact to regulate defense against pathogens, and auxin–cytokinin balance determines root–shoot architecture (54,55). These interactions form dynamic regulatory hubs embedded within broader metabolic and gene networks, enabling plants to efficiently allocate resources under changing environmental conditions (56). A critical outcome of this integration is the growth–defense trade-off, where favorable conditions promote growth through anabolic pathways and TOR signaling, while stress activates energy-sensing pathways such as SnRK1, shifting metabolism toward defense responses often mediated by ABA and JA (57,58). Understanding and manipulating these hormonal networks allows targeted improvement of stress tolerance while maintaining yield stability, with genome editing of key signaling components offering promising strategies for developing climate-resilient crops (59).

3.3 Stress Physiology and Metabolic Plasticity

Plants exposed to climate change face multiple simultaneous stresses, and their survival depends on physiological resilience and metabolic plasticity, the ability to dynamically reconfigure biochemical pathways in response to environmental changes (60). Abiotic stresses such as drought, heat, and salinity disrupt water balance, membrane stability, and redox homeostasis, but plants counter these effects through coordinated responses including stomatal closure, accumulation of osmolytes like proline and soluble sugars, and activation of antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase, catalase, and peroxidases, along with heat shock proteins and membrane lipid remodeling to maintain cellular integrity (61). Stress conditions also elevate reactive oxygen species (ROS), which, although harmful at high levels, function as signaling molecules that interact with hormonal pathways, calcium signaling, and transcription factors to regulate adaptive responses, making ROS central integrators of stress signaling networks (62). Metabolic plasticity enables redistribution of carbon and nitrogen resources, such as increased synthesis of osmoprotectants during drought, activation of defense-related pathways like phenylpropanoid metabolism during pathogen attack, and lipid adjustments under temperature stress, with genome-scale metabolic models showing coordinated flux changes that maintain energy balance and redox homeostasis (63–65). Additionally, plants develop stress memory through epigenetic and metabolic changes, allowing faster and stronger responses to recurring stress, a process known as priming (66). From a systems biology perspective, stress adaptation involves integrated regulation of gene networks, metabolic pathways, and signaling systems, and identifying key regulatory hubs and interactions enables the development of crops with enhanced resilience while maintaining growth and productivity under changing environmental conditions (67,68).

Table 2. Summary of major stress-responsive metabolic and regulatory pathways showing their stress context, functional role in plant stress tolerance, and potential targets for crop improvement.

4. Ecological and Evolutionary Dimensions of Plant Function

Plant function cannot be fully understood in isolation from its ecological and evolutionary context, as long-term adaptation and resilience arise from continuous interactions with environmental gradients, microbial communities, neighboring plants, and evolutionary pressures (82). Although molecular and physiological networks regulate immediate plant responses, integrating these with ecological processes is essential to understand how plants perform under real-world, heterogeneous environments (83). Environmental gradients such as temperature, precipitation, soil salinity, nutrient availability, and light intensity strongly influence plant distribution, growth, and metabolism, and adaptation to these gradients depends on both genetic diversity and phenotypic plasticity. Natural populations harbor extensive allelic variation in regulatory genes, transcription factors, and metabolic enzymes, enabling local adaptation, such as improved water-use efficiency, deeper root systems, and altered stomatal sensitivity in drought-adapted plants (84). Systems biology approaches integrated with genome-wide association studies and ecological datasets allow identification of adaptive loci and improve prediction of genotype–environment interactions under future climate scenarios (85). In parallel, phenotypic plasticity enables plants to dynamically adjust physiological and metabolic processes, including photosynthesis, root architecture, osmolyte accumulation, and membrane composition, providing short-term resilience without genetic change (86). Evolutionary diversification of regulatory networks, including expansion of transcription factors and signaling proteins, further enhances species-specific adaptation, while conserved stress-response pathways provide common resilience mechanisms that can be exploited for crop improvement (87).

Plant performance is also profoundly shaped by biotic interactions within ecological systems. The plant microbiome, including rhizosphere bacteria, mycorrhizal fungi, endophytes, and phyllosphere communities, plays a critical role in nutrient acquisition, stress tolerance, and disease resistance (88). For example, mycorrhizal associations enhance water and nutrient uptake, while nitrogen-fixing bacteria improve nitrogen assimilation, and beneficial microbes can modulate hormone signaling and activate systemic resistance pathways (89). Systems-level analyses reveal complex bidirectional communication between plants and microbes mediated by metabolites, signaling molecules, and small RNAs, while environmental stress can reshape microbial communities, influencing plant resilience (90). In addition to plant–microbe interactions, plant–plant interactions such as competition, facilitation, and allelopathy influence growth strategies, resource allocation, and stress adaptation. Plants communicate through volatile organic compounds, root exudates, and hormonal signals that can prime defense responses in neighboring plants, enhancing community-level resilience (91,92). These ecological interactions are further shaped by agricultural practices, where monocultures often reduce diversity and increase vulnerability, while strategies such as crop rotation, intercropping, and microbiome management improve system stability and stress tolerance (93). Thus, integrating ecological interactions with systems biology provides a comprehensive understanding of plant adaptation and supports the development of climate-resilient and sustainable agricultural systems.

Plant metabolic pathways and traits have evolved over millions of years under environmental pressures and ecological interactions, enabling plants to sustain growth, reproduction, and adaptation to changing conditions (94). This evolution is largely driven by gene duplication events such as whole-genome, tandem, and segmental duplications, which expand genes encoding enzymes and regulatory proteins, followed by neofunctionalization, subfunctionalization, or regulatory divergence, leading to diversification of metabolic pathways, including phenylpropanoids, alkaloids, terpenoids, and glucosinolates that enhance tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses (95). These secondary metabolites play a key role in plant defense and adaptation (96). Environmental stresses have further shaped these pathways, as seen in the independent evolution of C4 and CAM photosynthesis for hot and arid climates, lipid modifications for cold tolerance, and osmoprotectant accumulation in saline environments (97). Many stress-responsive networks originated from conserved ancestral systems and were later modified across lineages (98). Evolution also involves network rewiring through changes in promoters, transcription factor binding, and epigenetic regulation, altering metabolic flux and generating new adaptive traits while improving robustness, flexibility, and redundancy in plant systems (99). These insights help identify targets for crop improvement using advanced breeding and genome editing (100). Crop resilience is influenced by the interaction between genetic architecture and ecological factors such as climate variability, soil conditions, and pathogen pressure, which select for traits like deep root systems, efficient nutrient use, and strong immune responses (101). Integrating ecological and genomic data helps identify adaptive trait combinations for specific environments (102). Soil microbes further enhance resilience through improved nutrient uptake, hormone production, and stress resistance (103). Additionally, agroecosystem structure plays a critical role, with diversified systems like intercropping and agroforestry improving resilience compared to monocultures (104). Modern approaches integrating genomics, ecological data, and machine learning enable prediction of genotype–environment interactions for designing climate-resilient crops (105).

5. Bioinformatics and Computational Modeling in Plant Science

The rapid expansion of high-throughput omics technologies has generated vast plant biological datasets, whose value depends on effective integration and interpretation across molecular, physiological, and ecological levels. Bioinformatics and computational modeling form the backbone of plant systems biology by transforming these datasets into predictive frameworks for crop improvement (116,117). Systems modeling represents plant processes as interconnected networks of genes, proteins, and metabolites, where gene regulatory network analysis identifies key transcription factors and regulatory hubs, and genome-scale metabolic models combined with flux balance analysis simulate carbon and nitrogen allocation and reveal metabolic constraints (118,119). Dynamic and multiscale models further integrate multi-omics data to connect molecular interactions with whole-plant physiology and field performance under stress conditions (120).

Artificial intelligence and machine learning enhance these approaches by analyzing complex datasets to predict breeding values, capture genotype × environment interactions, and improve crop trait prediction, while also supporting high-throughput phenotyping and precision agriculture (121). Integrative databases and digital plant platforms enable efficient data organization, interoperability, and genotype–phenotype mapping, while digital twin technologies allow in silico simulation of plant growth, stress responses, and management strategies  (122).

Despite these advances, challenges such as data heterogeneity, lack of standardization, high computational demands, limited field datasets, and issues of model interpretability constrain predictive accuracy and application  (123). Addressing these limitations through standardized frameworks, open-access resources, and interdisciplinary collaboration will strengthen the integration of mechanistic modeling with AI-driven analytics, ultimately enabling data-driven crop design and accelerating the development of climate-resilient, high-productivity agricultural systems  (124).

6. Biotechnology and Metabolic Engineering for Crop Improvement

Advances in plant systems biology have enabled a detailed understanding of regulatory networks, metabolic pathways, and stress-response mechanisms, which can now be translated into crop improvement through biotechnology and metabolic engineering. Modern approaches have shifted from single-gene modifications to systems-guided strategies, focusing on regulatory hubs, metabolic flux optimization, and hormonal balance to enhance productivity, resilience, and nutritional quality  (125). Genome editing technologies such as CRISPR–Cas allow precise gene modifications, including targeted mutations, promoter tuning, and multiplex editing, enabling fine control of stress responses like drought tolerance through pathways such as abscisic acid (ABA) signaling. Emerging tools like base and prime editing further improve accuracy, while systems biology helps identify key targets such as transcription factors and signaling nodes for coordinated trait improvement  (126).

Engineering stress tolerance involves integrated manipulation of hormonal pathways, antioxidant systems, and metabolic processes. Enhancing enzymes like superoxide dismutase and catalase improves redox balance, while accumulation of osmoprotectants such as proline and sugars supports tolerance to drought and salinity (127). At the same time, optimizing root architecture enhances water and nutrient uptake. These modifications require careful systems-level tuning to balance growth and stress defense. Metabolic redesign also plays a crucial role in improving yield and nutrition by enhancing photosynthesis, optimizing carbon partitioning toward grains or storage tissues, and enabling biofortification with essential micronutrients. Systems modeling ensures that such modifications maintain overall metabolic stability and avoid trade-offs (128).

Synthetic biology further advances crop improvement by enabling the design of programmable genetic circuits and engineered pathways. Stress-inducible systems allow crops to activate protective responses only under adverse conditions, minimizing growth penalties (129). The development of “smart crops,” equipped with biosensors and responsive regulatory systems, enables real-time adaptation to environmental changes. When combined with computational modeling and digital agriculture, this creates an iterative design framework where predictions guide genetic modifications and field data refine future strategies (130). Integrating genome editing, metabolic engineering, synthetic biology, and systems modeling enables proactive development of climate-resilient, high-yielding, and nutritionally enhanced crops, supporting sustainable agriculture under changing environmental conditions (131).

7 . Plant Responses to Climate Change

Climate change exposes plants to multiple interacting stresses such as drought, heat, salinity, and elevated CO₂, which collectively disrupt metabolism, growth, and productivity across molecular, physiological, and ecological levels. Unlike single-stress laboratory conditions, plants in natural environments face combined stresses that require coordinated, system-level responses involving stress signaling pathways, metabolic plasticity, and ecological interactions (132). Drought and salinity impair water and ion balance, while heat stress affects protein stability and photosynthesis; all these stresses generate oxidative stress regulated by antioxidant systems and hormones like abscisic acid (ABA). Plants respond through osmoprotectant accumulation, metabolic reprogramming, and activation of stress-responsive genes, but their combined effects are complex and best understood using systems biology approaches (133).

Climate change also significantly alters carbon balance and plant productivity. Elevated CO₂ can enhance photosynthesis in C3 plants, but this benefit is often limited by nutrient availability, water scarcity, and acclimation responses. At the same time, rising temperatures increase respiration rates, leading to carbon loss and reduced biomass accumulation (134). Environmental stresses modify carbon allocation between roots and shoots, often reducing reproductive efficiency and yield. These physiological changes extend to ecosystem levels, influencing carbon sequestration, soil processes, and climate feedbacks. Therefore, integrating carbon–nitrogen interactions and metabolic fluxes through systems-level models is essential for predicting crop performance under future climate conditions (135).

To address these challenges, predictive modeling frameworks integrate genomic, physiological, metabolic, and environmental data to simulate plant responses across diverse scenarios. Modeling genotype × environment × management (G×E×M) interactions, combined with artificial intelligence and machine learning, enables the identification of region-specific, climate-resilient cultivars. Advanced tools such as crop simulation models and digital twin technologies allow in silico testing of genetic modifications and stress conditions, accelerating crop improvement while reducing field trial costs (136).

Ultimately, achieving climate-resilient agriculture requires integrative strategies that combine systems breeding, multi-omics approaches, and climate-smart agricultural practices with ecological sustainability and supportive policies. Enhancing multiple traits simultaneously, such as root architecture, carbon-use efficiency, and stress tolerance, ensures stable productivity under variable climates (137). Sustainable practices like precision irrigation, nutrient management, crop diversification, and soil microbiome enhancement complement genetic improvements. Ensuring equitable access to technology, regulatory harmonization, and global collaboration is also essential (138). By integrating systems biology, AI-driven prediction, and sustainable management, agriculture can shift from reactive stress responses to proactive climate adaptation, ensuring long-term resilience and global food security.

8 . Translational Applications and Future Directions

Integrative plant systems biology is transforming crop science by linking mechanistic understanding with practical agricultural applications. The focus is shifting from single-trait improvement to systems-based breeding, which integrates multi-omics data, gene regulatory networks, and genotype × environment × management interactions (139). This approach enables the identification of key regulatory hubs and coordinated trait networks, allowing crops to develop synchronized stress responses. Artificial intelligence and predictive modeling further enhance breeding efficiency by simulating trait combinations and identifying climate-resilient cultivars. When combined with climate-smart agricultural practices such as precision irrigation, nutrient optimization, and conservation strategies, these innovations improve productivity while minimizing environmental impact (140).

A critical advancement in crop biotechnology is the integration of ecological context into genetic innovation. Traits optimized under laboratory conditions often behave differently in dynamic field environments, making ecological compatibility essential for long-term performance  (141). Incorporating ecological modeling ensures stability of engineered traits across diverse conditions and supports balanced nutrient cycling. The plant microbiome represents a promising frontier, where crops can be engineered to recruit beneficial microbes that enhance stress tolerance, nutrient uptake, and disease resistance. Additionally, adopting landscape-level approaches that connect molecular traits with ecosystem processes can improve biodiversity, resilience, and sustainability in agricultural systems  (142).

Future progress in plant systems biology depends on coordinated advancements across scientific, technological, and policy domains. Priorities include developing standardized frameworks for multi-omics data integration, expanding multi-location phenotyping to capture environmental variability, and improving the interpretability of AI-driven models  (143). Integrating ecological and socio-economic data into crop design will enable context-specific innovations suited to regional conditions. At the same time, harmonized regulatory frameworks for genome-edited crops are necessary to accelerate deployment while ensuring biosafety and public trust. Strong interdisciplinary collaboration will be essential to build predictive, adaptive, and sustainable agricultural systems  (144).

Crop improvement is increasingly moving toward multi-omics guided design, which combines genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and phenomics with environmental data to construct high-resolution genotype–phenotype relationships. This approach shifts breeding from empirical trial-and-error methods to rational, predictive engineering (145). Instead of targeting individual genes, it focuses on network-level components such as regulatory hubs, metabolic pathways, and coordinated stress-response systems. By integrating environmental and climate data, multi-omics approaches enable the development of region-specific cultivars with enhanced resilience and reduced input requirements, aligning crop design with sustainability and climate adaptation goals (146).

Technological innovation alone is insufficient to achieve climate-resilient agriculture; it must be supported by effective policies, equitable access, and sustainable practices. Regulatory harmonization for genome-edited crops is essential to facilitate global deployment while maintaining biosafety standards (147). Future agricultural strategies should prioritize reduced reliance on fertilizers and pesticides, improved water-use efficiency, soil health, biodiversity conservation, and nutritional enhancement through biofortification. Ensuring global food security also requires investment in underutilized crops, open-access genomic resources, and international research collaboration (148). Furthermore, addressing potential inequalities in access to digital agriculture and AI technologies is critical. A systems-based approach that integrates scientific innovation, ecological sustainability, and socio-economic equity will be key to achieving long-term agricultural stability and food security under changing climate conditions (149).

9. Conclusion

Climate change poses significant challenges to agricultural productivity, ecosystem resilience, and global food security, necessitating integrative approaches in plant science. Integrative plant systems biology bridges molecular, physiological, and ecological dimensions, linking genomics, metabolism, and environmental interactions to understand plant adaptation as a coordinated system rather than isolated processes. Multi-omics technologies have enabled reconstruction of gene regulatory networks and metabolic pathways, while physiological processes such as photosynthesis, respiration, hormonal signaling, and redox balance collectively determine plant responses to stresses like drought, heat, salinity, and oxidative damage. At the ecological level, plant–microbe interactions and environmental variability further shape resilience and productivity, emphasizing the need for a holistic perspective.

Advances in bioinformatics, artificial intelligence, and computational modeling have transformed plant science from descriptive to predictive and design-oriented research. Tools such as genome-scale metabolic models, gene network analysis, and machine learning-based genomic selection enable accurate modeling of genotype × environment × management interactions, accelerating the development of climate-resilient crops. Biotechnology and synthetic biology further enhance this potential through precision genome editing and metabolic engineering, allowing targeted improvement of stress tolerance, carbon allocation, and nutritional traits. Importantly, integrating ecological principles ensures that engineered traits function effectively within real agroecosystems. Achieving climate-resilient agriculture requires strong interdisciplinary collaboration among biologists, ecologists, computational scientists, agronomists, and policymakers. Open-access data systems, standardized frameworks, and global research networks are essential to support innovation and equitable technology dissemination. Future crop improvement must move beyond single-trait selection toward network-level optimization, focusing on multi-stress tolerance, resource-use efficiency, and ecosystem compatibility. Overall, integrative plant systems biology provides both a conceptual framework and a practical pathway for shifting agriculture from reactive stress management to proactive design of resilient crops, ensuring long-term sustainability and global food security under changing climate conditions.

References

1. Janssen, P. J., Lambreva, M. D., Plumeré, N., Bartolucci, C., Antonacci, A., Buonasera, K., Frese, R. N., Scognamiglio, V., & Rea, G. (2014). Photosynthesis at the forefront of a sustainable life. Frontiers in chemistry, 2, 36. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2014.00036

2. Xue, J., & Yin, Y. (2024). Plant-Based Food: From Nutritional Value to Health Benefits. Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 13(22), 3595. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13223595

3. Ashwani Pareek, Om Parkash Dhankher, Christine H Foyer, Mitigating the impact of climate change on plant productivity and ecosystem sustainability, Journal of Experimental Botany, Volume 71, Issue 2, 7 January 2020, Pages 451–456, https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erz518

4. Skendžić, S., Zovko, M., Živković, I. P., Lešić, V., & Lemić, D. (2021). The Impact of Climate Change on Agricultural Insect Pests. Insects, 12(5), 440. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12050440

5. Singh, B. K., Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Egidi, E., Guirado, E., Leach, J. E., Liu, H., & Trivedi, P. (2023). Climate change impacts on plant pathogens, food security and paths forward. Nature Reviews. Microbiology, 21(10), 640–656. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-023-00900-7

6. Chawla, R., Poonia, A., Samantara, K., Mohapatra, S. R., Naik, S. B., Ashwath, M. N., Djalovic, I. G., & Prasad, P. V. V. (2023). Green revolution to genome revolution: driving better resilient crops against environmental instability. Frontiers in genetics, 14, 1204585. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1204585

7. Kundu, B. K., & Tanti, B. (2026). Decoding plant physiology through systems biology: Integrative multi-omics and computational perspectives for next-generation crop design. Plant communications, 7(3), 101668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xplc.2025.101668

8. Kesić S. (2016). Systems biology, emergence and antireductionism. Saudi journal of biological sciences, 23(5), 584–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.06.015

9. Kumar, A., Pathak, R. K., Gupta, S. M., Gaur, V. S., & Pandey, D. (2015). Systems Biology for Smart Crops and Agricultural Innovation: Filling the Gaps between Genotype and Phenotype for Complex Traits Linked with Robust Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability. Omics : a journal of integrative biology, 19(10), 581–601. https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2015.0106

10. Roychowdhury, R., Das, S. P., Gupta, A., Parihar, P., Chandrasekhar, K., Sarker, U., Kumar, A., Ramrao, D. P., & Sudhakar, C. (2023). Multi-Omics Pipeline and Omics-Integration Approach to Decipher Plant’s Abiotic Stress Tolerance Responses. Genes, 14(6), 1281. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14061281

11. Novoplansky, A., Souza, G. M., Brenner, E. D., Bhatla, S. C., & Van Volkenburgh, E. (2024). Exploring the complex information processes underlying plant behavior. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2024.2411913

12. Li, L., Liu, K. H., & Sheen, J. (2021). Dynamic Nutrient Signaling Networks in Plants. Annual review of cell and developmental biology, 37, 341–367. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-010521-015047

13. Mitra, S., Anand, U., Ghorai, M., Kant, N., Kumar, M., Radha, ., Jha, N. K., Swamy, M. K., Proćków, J., Lastra, J. M. P. d. l., & Dey, A. (2023). Genome editing technologies, mechanisms and improved production of therapeutic phytochemicals: Opportunities and prospects. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 120, 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.28260

14. Zhu, Q., Wang, B., Tan, J., Liu, T., Li, L., & Liu, Y. G. (2019). Plant Synthetic Metabolic Engineering for Enhancing Crop Nutritional Quality. Plant communications, 1(1), 100017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xplc.2019.100017

15. Thingujam, D., Gouli, S., Cooray, S. P., Chandran, K. B., Givens, S. B., Gandhimeyyan, R. V., Tan, Z., Wang, Y., Patam, K., Greer, S. A., Acharya, R., Moseley, D. O., Osman, N., Zhang, X., Brooker, M. E., Tagert, M. L., Schafer, M. J., Jeong, C., Hoffseth, K. F., Bheemanahalli, R., … Mukhtar, M. S. (2025). Climate-Resilient Crops: Integrating AI, Multi-Omics, and Advanced Phenotyping to Address Global Agricultural and Societal Challenges. Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 14(17), 2699. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14172699

16. Joyard, J., & McCormick, S. (2010). Plant Systems Biology. Plant Physiology, 152(2), 401. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.900314

17. Napier, J. D., Heckman, R. W., & Juenger, T. E. (2023). Gene-by-environment interactions in plants: Molecular mechanisms, environmental drivers, and adaptive plasticity. The Plant cell, 35(1), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koac322

18. Zhang, X., Man, Y., Zhuang, X., Shen, J., Zhang, Y., Cui, Y., Yu, M., Xing, J., Wang, G., Lian, N., Hu, Z., Ma, L., Shen, W., Yang, S., Xu, H., Bian, J., Jing, Y., Li, X., Li, R., Mao, T., … Lin, J. (2021). Plant multiscale networks: charting plant connectivity by multi-level analysis and imaging techniques. Science China. Life sciences, 64(9), 1392–1422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-020-1910-1

19. Enrique López-Juez, Plastid biogenesis, between light and shadows, Journal of Experimental Botany, Volume 58, Issue 1, January 2007, Pages 11–26, https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erl196

20. Norma Fàbregas, Takuya Yoshida, Alisdair R Fernie, Bidirectional crosstalk between plant hormone signaling and metabolism, Plant Physiology, Volume 200, Issue 2, February 2026, kiaf630, https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiaf630

21. Rao, X., & Liu, W. (2025). A Guide to Metabolic Network Modeling for Plant Biology. Plants, 14(3), 484. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14030484

22. Lucas, M., Laplaze, L., & Bennett, M. J. (2011). Plant systems biology: network matters. Plant, cell & environment, 34(4), 535–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02273.x

23. Mohaimin, A. Z., Krishnamoorthy, S., & Shivanand, P. (2024). A critical review on bioaerosols-dispersal of crop pathogenic microorganisms and their impact on crop yield. Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 55(1), 587–628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-023-01179-9

24. Li Pu, Siobhan Brady, Systems Biology Update: Cell Type-Specific Transcriptional Regulatory Networks, Plant Physiology, Volume 152, Issue 2, February 2010, Pages 411–419, https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.148668

25. Razalli, I. I., Abdullah-Zawawi, M. R., Zainal Abidin, R. A., Harun, S., Che Othman, M. H., Ismail, I., & Zainal, Z. (2025). Identification and validation of hub genes associated with biotic and abiotic stresses by modular gene co-expression analysis in Oryza sativa L. Scientific reports, 15(1), 8465. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92942-5

26. Ogbuji, N. G., & Agogbua, J. U. (2025). Genomics in plant pathogen identification and control. Frontiers in plant science, 16, 1661432. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1661432

27. Bondar, E. I., Zubairova, U. S., Bobrovskikh, A. V., & Doroshkov, A. V. (2025). Integrative Transcriptomic and Evolutionary Analysis of Drought and Heat Stress Responses in Solanum tuberosum and Solanum lycopersicum. Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 14(24), 3851. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14243851

28. Chandramouli, K., & Qian, P. Y. (2009). Proteomics: challenges, techniques and possibilities to overcome biological sample complexity. Human genomics and proteomics : HGP, 2009, 239204. https://doi.org/10.4061/2009/239204

29. Qiu, S., Cai, Y., Yao, H., Lin, C., Xie, Y., Tang, S., & Zhang, A. (2023). Small molecule metabolites: discovery of biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Signal transduction and targeted therapy, 8(1), 132. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-023-01399-3

30. Fu, P., Montes, C. M., Siebers, M. H., Gomez-Casanovas, N., McGrath, J. M., Ainsworth, E. A., & Bernacchi, C. J. (2022). Advances in field-based high-throughput photosynthetic phenotyping. Journal of experimental botany, 73(10), 3157–3172. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erac077

31. Lv, Y., & Fan, G. (2026). Network-Driven Insights into Plant Immunity: Integrating Transcriptomic and Proteomic Approaches in Plant–Pathogen Interactions. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 27(3), 1242. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27031242

32. Zhao, Q., Li, G., & Du, K. (2025). Applications of machine learning and deep learning in precision medicine: Opportunities and challenges in genomics, oncology and clinical integration (Review). Biomedical reports, 23(6), 192. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2025.2070

33. Nkuna, R., Mohlomi, N., & Matambo, T. S. (2026). From Omics to Applications: How Bioinformatics and Multi-Omics Approaches Are Revolutionizing Metal Bioleaching. Minerals, 16(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/min16010056

34. Walker, B. J., & Schroeder, W. L. (2026). Understanding plant resilience by putting photosynthesis and photorespiration in the metabolic context. Planta, 263(4), 94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-026-04961-9

35. Nazari, M., Kordrostami, M., Ghasemi-Soloklui, A. A., Eaton-Rye, J. J., Pashkovskiy, P., Kuznetsov, V., & Allakhverdiev, S. I. (2024). Enhancing Photosynthesis and Plant Productivity through Genetic Modification. Cells, 13(16), 1319. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13161319
    
    
36. Roach, T., & Krieger-Liszkay, A. (2014). Regulation of photosynthetic electron transport and photoinhibition. Current protein & peptide science, 15(4), 351–362. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389203715666140327105143

37. Qiao, M., Hong, C., Jiao, Y., Hou, S., & Gao, H. (2024). Impacts of Drought on Photosynthesis in Major Food Crops and the Related Mechanisms of Plant Responses to Drought. Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 13(13), 1808. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131808

38. Igamberdiev, A. U., & Bykova, N. V. (2023). Mitochondria in photosynthetic cells: Coordinating redox control and energy balance. Plant physiology, 191(4), 2104–2119. https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiac541

39. Vishwakarma, A., Tetali, S. D., Selinski, J., Scheibe, R., & Padmasree, K. (2015). Importance of the alternative oxidase (AOX) pathway in regulating cellular redox and ROS homeostasis to optimize photosynthesis during restriction of the cytochrome oxidase pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana. Annals of botany, 116(4), 555–569. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcv122

40. Saile, J., Wießner-Kroh, T., Erbstein, K., Obermüller, D. M., Pfeiffer, A., Janocha, D., Lohmann, J., & Wachter, A. (2023). SNF1-RELATED KINASE 1 and TARGET OF RAPAMYCIN control light-responsive splicing events and developmental characteristics in etiolated Arabidopsis seedlings. The Plant cell, 35(9), 3413–3428. https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koad168

41. Eom, S. H., Kim, E., & Hyun, T. K. (2024). HXK, SnRK1, and TOR signaling in plants: Unraveling mechanisms of stress response and secondary metabolism. Science progress, 107(4), 368504241301533. https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504241301533

42. Zecua-Ramirez, P., Jha, V., & Stegmann, M. (2026). Peptide signaling at the intersection of growth, nutrient sensing, and stress responses. The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 125(4), e70733. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.70733

43. Dusenge, M.E., Duarte, A.G. and Way, D.A. (2019), Plant carbon metabolism and climate change: elevated CO2 and temperature impacts on photosynthesis, photorespiration and respiration. New Phytol, 221: 32-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15283

44. Judge, A., & Dodd, M. S. (2020). Metabolism. Essays in biochemistry, 64(4), 607–647. https://doi.org/10.1042/EBC20190041

45. Gurrieri, L., Merico, M., Trost, P., Forlani, G., & Sparla, F. (2020). Impact of Drought on Soluble Sugars and Free Proline Content in Selected Arabidopsis Mutants. Biology, 9(11), 367. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology9110367

46. Khan, A., Kanwal, F., Ullah, S., Fahad, M., Tariq, L., Altaf, M. T., Riaz, A., & Zhang, G. (2025). Plant Secondary Metabolites-Central Regulators Against Abiotic and Biotic Stresses. Metabolites, 15(4), 276. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo15040276

47. Pandey, E., Kumari, R., Faizan, S., & Pandey, S. (2025). Linking the interaction of Salicylates and Jasmonates for stress resilience in plants. Stress biology, 5(1), 64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44154-025-00250-9

48. Shomali, A., Das, S., Arif, N., Sarraf, M., Zahra, N., Yadav, V., Aliniaeifard, S., Chauhan, D. K., & Hasanuzzaman, M. (2022). Diverse Physiological Roles of Flavonoids in Plant Environmental Stress Responses and Tolerance. Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 11(22), 3158. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223158

49. Sharma, A., Shahzad, B., Rehman, A., Bhardwaj, R., Landi, M., & Zheng, B. (2019). Response of Phenylpropanoid Pathway and the Role of Polyphenols in Plants under Abiotic Stress. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 24(13), 2452. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24132452

50. Stitt, M., Sulpice, R., & Keurentjes, J. (2010). Metabolic networks: how to identify key components in the regulation of metabolism and growth. Plant physiology, 152(2), 428–444. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.150821

51. Kurepa, J., & Smalle, J. (2025). The Evolution of Plant Hormones: From Metabolic Byproducts to Regulatory Hubs. International journal of molecular sciences, 26(15), 7190. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26157190

52. Faizan, M., Chen, J., Karabulut, F., Sharma, R., Afzal, S., Sharma, P., Alam, P., Hayat, S., Khan, I., Ahmed, S. M., Dai, X., Wan, H., Zeng, C., & Sultan, H. (2026). Plant hormones and membrane transporters: integrating nutrient uptake, ion homeostasis, and stress responses through hormonal cross-talk. Frontiers in plant science, 16, 1699212. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1699212

53. Ritonga, F. N., Zhou, D., Zhang, Y., Song, R., Li, C., Li, J., & Gao, J. (2023). The Roles of Gibberellins in Regulating Leaf Development. Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 12(6), 1243. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12061243

54. Munné-Bosch, S., & Müller, M. (2013). Hormonal cross-talk in plant development and stress responses. Frontiers in plant science, 4, 529. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00529

55. Tamaoki, D., Seo, S., Yamada, S., Kano, A., Miyamoto, A., Shishido, H., Miyoshi, S., Taniguchi, S., Akimitsu, K., & Gomi, K. (2013). Jasmonic acid and salicylic acid activate a common defense system in rice. Plant signaling & behavior, 8(6), e24260. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.24260

56. Yin, L., Zander, M., Huang, S. C., Xie, M., Song, L., Saldierna Guzmán, J. P., Hann, E., Shanbhag, B. K., Ng, S., Jain, S., Janssen, B. J., Clark, N. M., Walley, J. W., Beddoe, T., Bar-Joseph, Z., Lewsey, M. G., & Ecker, J. R. (2023). Transcription Factor Dynamics in Cross-Regulation of Plant Hormone Signaling Pathways. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023.03.07.531630. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.07.531630

57. Burkart, G. M., & Brandizzi, F. (2021). A Tour of TOR Complex Signaling in Plants. Trends in biochemical sciences, 46(5), 417–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2020.11.004

58. Wurzinger, B., Nukarinen, E., Nägele, T., Weckwerth, W., & Teige, M. (2018). The SnRK1 Kinase as Central Mediator of Energy Signaling between Different Organelles. Plant physiology, 176(2), 1085–1094. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.01404

59. Huot, B., Yao, J., Montgomery, B. L., & He, S. Y. (2014). Growth-defense tradeoffs in plants: a balancing act to optimize fitness. Molecular plant, 7(8), 1267–1287. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssu049

60. Sara I Zandalinas, Damián Balfagón, Aurelio Gómez-Cadenas, Ron Mittler, Plant responses to climate change: metabolic changes under combined abiotic stresses, Journal of Experimental Botany, Volume 73, Issue 11, 2 June 2022, Pages 3339–3354, https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erac073

61. Zhao, W., Chen, X., Wang, J., Cheng, Z., Ma, X., Zheng, Q., Xu, Z., & Zhang, F. (2025). Emerging Mechanisms of Plant Responses to Abiotic Stress. Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 14(22), 3445. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14223445

62. Liu, S., Liu, J., Wang, Y., Deng, F., & Deng, Z. (2025). Oxidative Stress: Signaling Pathways, Biological Functions, and Disease. MedComm, 6(7), e70268. https://doi.org/10.1002/mco2.70268

63. Pérez-Martín, J. E., Bonte, D., Osorio, S., & Posé, D. (2026). Metabolic plasticity and adaptive evolution in Fragaria vesca: bridging wild diversity to crop improvement. Frontiers in plant science, 16, 1729002. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1729002

64. Yadav, V., Wang, Z., Wei, C., Amo, A., Ahmed, B., Yang, X., & Zhang, X. (2020). Phenylpropanoid Pathway Engineering: An Emerging Approach towards Plant Defense. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 9(4), 312. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9040312

65. Wu, G., Baumeister, R., & Heimbucher, T. (2023). Molecular Mechanisms of Lipid-Based Metabolic Adaptation Strategies in Response to Cold. Cells, 12(10), 1353. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12101353

66. Kambona, C. M., Koua, P. A., Léon, J., & Ballvora, A. (2023). Stress memory and its regulation in plants experiencing recurrent drought conditions. TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 136(2), 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-023-04313-1

67. Wang, M., Zhao, Y., Huang, Y., & Liu, J. (2025). Integrating Drought Stress Signaling and Smart Breeding for Climate-Resilient Crops: Regulatory Mechanisms and Genetic Strategies. Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 14(24), 3714. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14243714

68. Lv, Y., & Fan, G. (2026). Network-Driven Insights into Plant Immunity: Integrating Transcriptomic and Proteomic Approaches in Plant-Pathogen Interactions. International journal of molecular sciences, 27(3), 1242. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27031242
69. Qiao, M., Hong, C., Jiao, Y., Hou, S., & Gao, H. (2024). Impacts of Drought on Photosynthesis in Major Food Crops and the Related Mechanisms of Plant Responses to Drought. Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 13(13), 1808. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131808

70. Zhang, Z., Zhu, G., & Peng, X. (2024). Photorespiration in plant adaptation to environmental changes. Crop and Environment, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crope.2024.07.001

71. Y.Zhang, A. R.Fernie, The Role of TCA Cycle Enzymes in Plants. Adv. Biology2023, 7, 2200238. https://doi.org/10.1002/adbi.202200238

72. Ghosh, U. K., Islam, M. N., Siddiqui, M. N., & Khan, M. A. R. (2021). Understanding the roles of osmolytes for acclimatizing plants to changing environment: a review of potential mechanism. Plant signaling & behavior, 16(8), 1913306. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2021.1913306

73. Ramaroson, M. L., Koutouan, C., Helesbeux, J. J., Le Clerc, V., Hamama, L., Geoffriau, E., & Briard, M. (2022). Role of Phenylpropanoids and Flavonoids in Plant Resistance to Pests and Diseases. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 27(23), 8371. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238371

74. Gil, M., Pontin, M., Berli, F., Bottini, R., & Piccoli, P. (2012). Metabolism of terpenes in the response of grape (Vitis vinifera L.) leaf tissues to UV-B radiation. Phytochemistry, 77, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.12.011

75. Mansoor, S., Ali Wani, O., Lone, J. K., Manhas, S., Kour, N., Alam, P., Ahmad, A., & Ahmad, P. (2022). Reactive Oxygen Species in Plants: From Source to Sink. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 11(2), 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11020225

76. Lim, C. W., Baek, W., Jung, J., Kim, J.-H., & Lee, S. C. (2015). Function of ABA in Stomatal Defense against Biotic and Drought Stresses. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 16(7), 15251-15270. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160715251

77. Wang, Y., Mostafa, S., Zeng, W., & Jin, B. (2021). Function and Mechanism of Jasmonic Acid in Plant Responses to Abiotic and Biotic Stresses. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(16), 8568. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22168568

78. Gao, Q. M., Zhu, S., Kachroo, P., & Kachroo, A. (2015). Signal regulators of systemic acquired resistance. Frontiers in plant science, 6, 228. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00228

79. Loewith, R., & Hall, M. N. (2011). Target of rapamycin (TOR) in nutrient signaling and growth control. Genetics, 189(4), 1177–1201. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.111.133363

80. Zhao, Y., Wang, X., Lei, Q., Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Ji, H., Ma, C., Wang, P., Song, C. P., & Zhu, X. (2025). The SnRK1-JMJ15-CRF6 module integrates energy and mitochondrial signaling to balance growth and the oxidative stress response in Arabidopsis. The New phytologist, 246(1), 158–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.20425

81. Queitsch, C., Hong, S. W., Vierling, E., & Lindquist, S. (2000). Heat shock protein 101 plays a crucial role in thermotolerance in Arabidopsis. The Plant cell, 12(4), 479–492. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.12.4.479

82. Hnini, M., Rabeh, K., & Oubohssaine, M. (2025). Understanding plant-microorganism interactions: The key roles of soil, rhizosphere, and direct and indirect mechanisms. AIMS microbiology, 11(4), 1035–1078. https://doi.org/10.3934/microbiol.2025046

83. Ramachandran, P., Ramirez, A., & Dinneny, J. R. (2024). Rooting for survival: how plants tackle a challenging environment through a diversity of root forms and functions. Plant physiology, 197(1), kiae586. https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiae586

84. Blinkova, O., Żytkowiak, R., Wiland-Szymańska, J., Sowelo, M., Jaźwa, M., Ratajczak, E., & Jagodziński, A. M. (2025). Multilevel trait responses of liana Hedera helix L. to environmental gradients in urban forest ecosystems. Scientific reports, 15(1), 40155. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-23815-0

85. Sanches, M., Vuylsteke, M., Santos, C., Mhamdi, A., Araújo, S., Van Breusegem, F., & Patto, M. C. V. (2026). Integrating natural variation through GWAS – genetics of drought and flood tolerance in grass pea reveal independent yet interconnected mechanisms. BMC plant biology, 26(1), 442. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-026-08229-y

86. Fox, R. J., Donelson, J. M., Schunter, C., Ravasi, T., & Gaitán-Espitia, J. D. (2019). Beyond buying time: the role of plasticity in phenotypic adaptation to rapid environmental change. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 374(1768), 20180174. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0174

87. Brooks, A. N., Turkarslan, S., Beer, K. D., Lo, F. Y., & Baliga, N. S. (2011). Adaptation of cells to new environments. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine, 3(5), 544–561. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsbm.136

88. Wankhade, A., Wilkinson, E., Britt, D. W., & Kaundal, A. (2025). A Review of Plant–Microbe Interactions in the Rhizosphere and the Role of Root Exudates in Microbiome Engineering. Applied Sciences, 15(13), 7127. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15137127

89. Ahmed, N., Li, J., Li, Y., Deng, L., Deng, L., Chachar, M., Chachar, Z., Chachar, S., Hayat, F., Raza, A., Umrani, J. H., Gong, L., & Tu, P. (2025). Symbiotic synergy: How Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi enhance nutrient uptake, stress tolerance, and soil health through molecular mechanisms and hormonal regulation. IMA fungus, 16, e144989. https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.16.144989

90. Babalola, O. O., Fadiji, A. E., Enagbonma, B. J., Alori, E. T., Ayilara, M. S., & Ayangbenro, A. S. (2020). The Nexus Between Plant and Plant Microbiome: Revelation of the Networking Strategies. Frontiers in microbiology, 11, 548037. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.548037

91. Kong, C. H., Li, Z., Li, F. L., Xia, X. X., & Wang, P. (2024). Chemically Mediated Plant-Plant Interactions: Allelopathy and Allelobiosis. Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 13(5), 626. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13050626

92. Bergman, M. E., Chang, S. H., Boachon, B., Shabek, N., & Dudareva, N. (2026). Molecular insights into volatile organic compound sensing and signaling in plants. The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 125(6), e70789. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.70789

93. Integrative approaches to enhance reproductive resilience of crops for climate-proof agriculture,Plant Stress,Volume 15,2025,100704,ISSN 2667-064X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2024.100704.

94. Song, X., Fan, B. L., Hong, X., Su, P., & Sun, M. (2026). Unveiling Plant Metabolic Diversity: Integrating Metabolomics with Multi-Omics Approaches for Crop Improvement. Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 15(5), 846. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15050846

95. Machado, T. B., Picorelli, A. C. R., de Azevedo, B. L., de Aquino, I. L. M., Queiroz, V. F., Rodrigues, R. A. L., Araújo, J. P., Jr, Ullmann, L. S., Dos Santos, T. M., Marques, R. E., Guimarães, S. L., Andrade, A. C. S. P., Gularte, J. S., Demoliner, M., Filippi, M., Pereira, V. M. A. G., Spilki, F. R., Krupovic, M., Aylward, F. O., Del-Bem, L.-E., … Abrahão, J. S. (2023). Gene duplication as a major force driving the genome expansion in some giant viruses. Journal of virology, 97(12), e0130923. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.01309-23

96. Duarte, J. M., Cui, L., Wall, P. K., Zhang, Q., Zhang, X., Leebens-Mack, J., Ma, H., Altman, N., & dePamphilis, C. W. (2006). Expression pattern shifts following duplication indicative of subfunctionalization and neofunctionalization in regulatory genes of Arabidopsis. Molecular biology and evolution, 23(2), 469–478. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msj051

97. Heyduk K. (2022). Evolution of Crassulacean acid metabolism in response to the environment: past, present, and future. Plant physiology, 190(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiac303

98. Jia, A., Yang, Y., Wang, T., Xia, C., Li, L., Yu, S., Lan, H., Cao, L., & Liu, H. (2025). Genome-wide identification, evolutionary and expression analyses of the DUF538 gene family in maize. BMC plant biology, 25(1), 1704. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-025-07741-x

99. Shepherd, M. J., Pierce, A. P., & Taylor, T. B. (2023). Evolutionary innovation through transcription factor rewiring in microbes is shaped by levels of transcription factor activity, expression, and existing connectivity. PLoS biology, 21(10), e3002348. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002348

100. Kim, K. H., Park, D., & Lee, B. M. (2026). Biotechnological Strategies to Enhance Maize Resilience Under Climate Change. Biology, 15(2), 161. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology15020161

101. Yoselin Benitez‐Alfonso, Soanes, B. K., Zimba, S., Besiana Sinanaj, German, L., Sharma, V., Abhishek Bohra, Kolesnikova, A. A., Dunn, J., Martín, A. C., Muhammad, Zaki Saati‐Santamaría, García‐Fraile, P., Evander Alves Ferreira, Leidivan Almeida Frazão, Cowling, W., Siddique, M., Pandey, M. K., Farooq, M., & Varshney, R. K. (2023). Enhancing climate change resilience in agricultural crops. Current Biology, 33(23), R1246–R1261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2023.10.028

102. Panek, J., Gryta, A., Maj, W., Mącik, M., Oszust, K., Pertile, G., Pylak, M., Siegieda, D., Hallama, M., Hatano, R., Kandeler, E., Pathan, S. I., Pietramellara, G., Malusa, E., Weber, J., Turnau, K., Różalska, S., & Frąc, M. (2026). Plant-soil-microbiome interactions: mechanisms, advances, and challenges in sustainable agriculture and healthy agroecosystems. Frontiers in microbiology, 17, 1762743. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2026.1762743

103. Baloch, F. B., Zeng, N., Gong, H., Zhang, Z., Zhang, N., Baloch, S. B., Ali, S., & Li, B. (2024). Rhizobacterial volatile organic compounds: Implications for agricultural ecosystems’ nutrient cycling and soil health. Heliyon, 10(23), e40522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40522

104. Jaworski, C. C., Thomine, E., Rusch, A., Lavoir, A.-V., Wang, S., & Desneux, N. (2023). Crop diversification to promote arthropod pest management: A review. Agriculture Communications, 1(1), 100004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrcom.2023.100004

105. Fernandes, I. K., Vieira, C. C., Dias, K. O. G., & Fernandes, S. B. (2024). Using machine learning to combine genetic and environmental data for maize grain yield predictions across multi-environment trials. TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 137(8), 189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-024-04687-w

106. Qiao, X., Li, Q., Yin, H., Qi, K., Li, L., Wang, R., Zhang, S., & Paterson, A. H. (2019). Gene duplication and evolution in recurring polyploidization-diploidization cycles in plants. Genome biology, 20(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-019-1650-2

107. Shepherd, M. J., Pierce, A. P., & Taylor, T. B. (2023). Evolutionary innovation through transcription factor rewiring in microbes is shaped by levels of transcription factor activity, expression, and existing connectivity. PLoS biology, 21(10), e3002348. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002348

108. Way, D. A., Katul, G. G., Manzoni, S., & Vico, G. (2014). Increasing water use efficiency along the C3 to C4 evolutionary pathway: a stomatal optimization perspective. Journal of experimental botany, 65(13), 3683–3693. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru205

109. Anjali, Kumar, S., Korra, T., Thakur, R., Arutselvan, R., Kashyap, A. S., Nehela, Y., Chaplygin, V., Minkina, T., & Keswani, C. (2023). Role of plant secondary metabolites in defence and transcriptional regulation in response to biotic stress. Plant Stress, 8, 100154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2023.100154

110. Charlotte Møller, Martí March-Salas, Pieter De Frenne, J F Scheepens, Local adaptation and phenotypic plasticity in two forest understorey herbs in response to forest management intensity, AoB PLANTS, Volume 17, Issue 1, January 2025, plae061, https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plae061

111. Fess, T. L., Kotcon, J. B., & Benedito, V. A. (2011). Crop Breeding for Low Input Agriculture: A Sustainable Response to Feed a Growing World Population. Sustainability, 3(10), 1742-1772. https://doi.org/10.3390/su3101742

112. Liu, S., Wu, J., Cheng, Z., Wang, H., Jin, Z., Zhang, X., Zhang, D., & Xie, J. (2025). Microbe-mediated stress resistance in plants: the roles played by core and stress-specific microbiota. Microbiome, 13(1), 111. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-025-02103-z

113. Duchene, O., Vian, J.-F., & Celette, F. (2017). Intercropping with legume for agroecological cropping systems: Complementarity and facilitation processes and the importance of soil microorganisms. A review. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 240, 148–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.02.019

114. Carof, M., Godinot, O., & Le Cadre, E. (2022). Biodiversity-based cropping systems: A long-term perspective is necessary. Science of the Total Environment, 838, 156022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156022

115. Sinha, D., Maurya, A. K., Abdi, G., Majeed, M., Agarwal, R., Mukherjee, R., Ganguly, S., Aziz, R., Bhatia, M., Majgaonkar, A., Seal, S., Das, M., Banerjee, S., Chowdhury, S., Adeyemi, S. B., & Chen, J. T. (2023). Integrated Genomic Selection for Accelerating Breeding Programs of Climate-Smart Cereals. Genes, 14(7), 1484. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14071484

116. Vitorino R. (2024). Transforming Clinical Research: The Power of High-Throughput Omics Integration. Proteomes, 12(3), 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/proteomes12030025

117. Younas, M. U., Zuo, S., Qasim, M., Ahmad, I., Feng, Z., Korai, S. K., Zulfiqar, U., Feruza, T., Ibrokhim, I., & Malik, T. (2025). Multi-Omics Approaches in Plant Biology: Decoding Agronomic Traits for Sustainable Agriculture. Plant Stress, 101118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2025.101118

118. Long, T. A., Brady, S. M., & Benfey, P. N. (2008). Systems approaches to identifying gene regulatory networks in plants. Annual review of cell and developmental biology, 24, 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.24.110707.175408

119. Li, F., Chen, Y., Gustafsson, J., Wang, H., Wang, Y., Zhang, C., & Xing, X. (2023). Genome-scale metabolic models applied for human health and biopharmaceutical engineering. Quantitative biology (Beijing, China), 11(4), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1002/qub2.21

120. Jia, X., Sun, C., Zuo, Y., Li, G., Li, G., Ren, L., & Chen, G. (2016). Integrating transcriptomics and metabolomics to characterise the response of Astragalus membranaceus Bge. var. mongolicus (Bge.) to progressive drought stress. BMC genomics, 17, 188. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-2554-0

121. Yoosefzadeh Najafabadi, M., Hesami, M., & Eskandari, M. (2023). Machine Learning-Assisted Approaches in Modernized Plant Breeding Programs. Genes, 14(4), 777. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14040777

122. Lyu, Y., Cheng, C., Chen, X., Tang, S., Chen, S., Guan, X., Wu, L., Liang, Z., Zhu, Y., & Xia, G. (2026). Growth Simulation Model and Intelligent Management System of Horticultural Crops: Methods, Decisions, and Prospects. Horticulturae, 12(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12020139

123. Xu, Y., Li, Y., Wang, F., Zhang, Y., & Huang, D. (2025). Addressing the current challenges in the clinical application of AI-based Radiomics for cancer imaging. Frontiers in medicine, 12, 1674397. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1674397

124. Abiri, R., Rizan, N., Balasundram, S. K., Shahbazi, A. B., & Abdul-Hamid, H. (2023). Application of digital technologies for ensuring agricultural productivity. Heliyon, 9(12), e22601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22601

125. Selma, S., Ntelkis, N., Nguyen, T.H. and Goossens, A. (2023), Engineering the plant metabolic system by exploiting metabolic regulation. Plant J, 114: 1149-1163. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.16157

126. Li, Y., Wu, X., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, Q. (2022). CRISPR/Cas genome editing improves abiotic and biotic stress tolerance of crops. Frontiers in genome editing, 4, 987817. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgeed.2022.987817

127. Patel, M. K., Kumar, M., Li, W., Luo, Y., Burritt, D. J., Alkan, N., & Tran, L. P. (2020). Enhancing Salt Tolerance of Plants: From Metabolic Reprogramming to Exogenous Chemical Treatments and Molecular Approaches. Cells, 9(11), 2492. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9112492

128. Kaur, V., Yadav, S. K., Yadav, B., Madaan, S., Kheralia, M., & Chinnusamy, V. (2026). Root system architecture and drought adaptation: emerging tools and genetic insights. Frontiers in plant science, 17, 1753086. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2026.1753086

129. Clauer, P., Nou, A. X., Toth, T., Yu, Q., Chemla, Y., Boo, A., Yoon, K., & Voigt, C. (2026). Synthetic Biology of Plants and Microbes for Agriculture, Environment, and Future Applications. Chemical reviews, 126(2), 895–1109. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00687

130. Sarabandi, M., Meisam Zargar, Ghorbani, A., & Chen, M. (2025). Smart and sustainable nano-biosensing technologies for advancing stress detection and management in agriculture and beyond. Industrial Crops and Products, 226, 120713–120713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2025.120713

131. Chavhan, R. L., Jaybhaye, S. G., Hinge, V. R., Deshmukh, A. S., Shaikh, U. S., Jadhav, P. K., Kadam, U. S., & Hong, J. C. (2025). Emerging applications of gene editing technologies for the development of climate-resilient crops. Frontiers in genome editing, 7, 1524767. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgeed.2025.1524767

132. Li, N., Geng, Z., Huang, X., Huang, S., Song, L., Chen, R., Chen, Z., Du, L., & Xu, C. (2025). A Review of Differential Plant Responses to Drought, Heat, and Combined Drought + Heat Stress. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 47(12), 975. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47120975

133. Ma, Y., Dias, M. C., & Freitas, H. (2020). Drought and Salinity Stress Responses and Microbe-Induced Tolerance in Plants. Frontiers in plant science, 11, 591911. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.591911

134. Ekele, J. U., Webster, R., Perez de Heredia, F., Lane, K. E., Fadel, A., & Symonds, R. C. (2025). Current impacts of elevated CO2 on crop nutritional quality: a review using wheat as a case study. Stress biology, 5(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44154-025-00217-w

135. Beattie, G. A., Edlund, A., Esiobu, N., Gilbert, J., Nicolaisen, M. H., Jansson, J. K., Jensen, P., Keiluweit, M., Lennon, J. T., Martiny, J., Minnis, V. R., Newman, D., Peixoto, R., Schadt, C., & van der Meer, J. R. (2025). Soil microbiome interventions for carbon sequestration and climate mitigation. mSystems, 10(1), e0112924. https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.01129-24

136. Wang, K., Xia, L., Yang, X., Du, C., Tang, T., Yang, Z., Ma, S., Wan, X., Guan, F., Shi, B., Xie, Y., & Zhang, J. (2025). Integrating Artificial Intelligence and Biotechnology to Enhance Cold Stress Resilience in Legumes. Plants, 14(17), 2784. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14172784

137. Singh, P. K., Singh, S., Manzoor, U., & Dubey, A. (2025). Enhancing Crop Sustainability through Climate-Resilient Agronomic Practices. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 15(6), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2025/v15i64874

138. Țopa, D.-C., Căpșună, S., Calistru, A.-E., & Ailincăi, C. (2025). Sustainable Practices for Enhancing Soil Health and Crop Quality in Modern Agriculture: A Review. Agriculture, 15(9), 998. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15090998

139. Fan, B.-L., Chen, L.-H., Chen, L.-L., & Guo, H. (2025). Integrative Multi-Omics Approaches for Identifying and Characterizing Biological Elements in Crop Traits: Current Progress and Future Prospects. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(4), 1466. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26041466

140. Mba, P. C., Njoku, J. N., & Uyeh, D. D. (2025). Enhancing Resilience in Specialty Crop Production in a Changing Climate Through Smart Systems Adoption. Smart Agricultural Technology, 100897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2025.100897

141. Zhang, D., Xu, F., Wang, F., Le, L., & Pu, L. (2025). Synthetic biology and artificial intelligence in crop improvement. Plant communications, 6(2), 101220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xplc.2024.101220

142. Fadiji, A. E., Adeniji, A., Lanrewaju, A. A., Adedayo, A. A., Chukwuneme, C. F., Nwachukwu, B. C., Aderibigbe, J., & Omomowo, I. O. (2025). Key Challenges in Plant Microbiome Research in the Next Decade. Microorganisms, 13(11), 2546. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13112546

143. Al-Sawa’eer, A. S., Al-Samydai, A., Odeh, L., Haj Ahmad, F., Obekh, R., Elqader, Y. M. A., Khaleel, A., Al-Athamneh, A. M., Gabriele, M., Di Simone, S. C., Ferrante, C., Menghini, L., & Ali Agha, A. S. A. (2026). Early Plant Development as a Systems-Level Trait: Integrating Omics, Artificial Intelligence, and Emerging Biotechnologies. Plants, 15(5), 787. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15050787

144. Zhu, F., Liu, Z., & Zheng, Z. (2026). An AI-driven framework for enhancing regulatory precision and efficiency in CRISPR-Cas gene-edited crops: challenges, opportunities, and global harmonization. Frontiers in plant science, 16, 1693105. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1693105

145. Yang, Y., Saand, M. A., Huang, L., Abdelaal, W. B., Zhang, J., Wu, Y., Li, J., Sirohi, M. H., & Wang, F. (2021). Applications of Multi-Omics Technologies for Crop Improvement. Frontiers in plant science, 12, 563953. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.563953

146. Seok, H.-Y., & Moon, Y.-H. (2026). Special Issue “Regulatory Mechanism and Network of Abiotic Stress Response in Plants 2.0”. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 27(7), 3215. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27073215

147. Kumar, K. R. R., & Singh, P. K. (2025). Editorial: Genome editing for climate change adaptation in agriculture: innovations, applications, and regulatory considerations. Frontiers in genome editing, 7, 1711767. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgeed.2025.1711767

148. Habib, M., Singh, S., Jan, S., Jan, K., & Bashir, K. (2025). The future of the future foods: understandings from the past towards SDG-2. NPJ science of food, 9(1), 138. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-025-00484-x

Omotayo, A. O., Adediran, S. A., Omotoso, A. B., Olagunju, K. O., & Omotayo, O. P. (2025). Artificial intelligence in agriculture: ethics, impact possibilities, and pathways for policy. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 239, 110927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2025.110927